My question that I propose to y'all is, What do you think of this, and would you think that this breaks Sleep Clause? I would say no, because the second sleep is technically self induced. It got me thinking, would this break Sleep Clause? In way the opponent did put two of the person's Pokemon asleep, but on the other hand the Hypnosis was bounced back and it originally came from the team that already had a sleeping Pokemon so that sleep would have been self induced. Evasion Clause: Moves that boost evasion like Minimize are banned. Then later in the battle the person used Hypnosis from their Milotic and the opponent switched into a Magic Bounce Espeon and bounced the Hypnosis back into the Milotic, putting it to sleep. Sleep Clause: Players can not induce sleep on more than one of the opponents Pokmon at once. The good players had means of dealing with it, especially with Team Preview alerting you to it. Before the Dark Void nerf, Smeargle was a major part of the VGC scene, but it wasn't the most dominant thing. You will be unable to start a duel in Tournament mode if this clause is broken. There is no Sleep Clause in VGC and this situation near enough never happens. Evasion Clause: All Pokemon may not have the moves Double Team or Minimize in its moveset. Bag Item Clause: You will be unable to use an item from your bag. I was watching a YouTube video of a Black and White battle, in the battle the opponent used Hypnosis from their Politoed to put a Latios to sleep. Sleep Clause is actually something that is used in the console games Stadium, Stadium 2, Colosseum, XD, and Battle Revolution. Potentially breaking this clause will make the sleep effect fail on the Pokemon.

Pokemon sleep clause